Abstract
BackgroundThis study compared a six-week triphasic resistance training (TRT) programme with a matched-volume traditional resistance training (TRAD) protocol to examine changes in speed and explosive lower-limb power among collegiate football players.
AimTo evaluate feasibility and performance outcomes between triphasic and traditional resistance training methods.
MethodsEight male athletes (18–25 years) were randomly assigned to either group. Performance was assessed using the 10 m sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ), and Modified Illinois Change-of-Direction (MI-COD) tests. Feasibility metrics were also recorded.
ResultsTRT showed greater improvements in CMJ (+5.4%), MI-COD (–3.9%), and sprint (–4.2%) compared with TRAD (<1%). Feasibility targets were fully achieved.
ConclusionTriphasic resistance training produced larger improvements in speed, vertical jump, and change-of-direction ability compared with traditional training. The programme was feasible, well tolerated, and safe for collegiate football players. A larger randomized trial is recommended to confirm these findings.